It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
Are there typos, spelling and/or grammatical errors?
Are images distorted or fuzzy? Are images authorized to appear on the website?
Does the website include "About" information? If so, is the information provided sufficient?
Is the journal sponsored or produced by a well-known, and well-respected organization, association, or academic institution?
Does the journal/publisher claim to be a "leading publisher" or use boastful language regarding their reputation? Some predatory publishers make boastful claims about their reputation, even if they are a startup or a new publisher.
What is the journal's peer review process? Is this process clearly explained on the journal's website? Can you verify that this process is actually followed?
Does the journal promise a quick peer-review?
Be wary of promises of a speedy peer-review process. Proper peer-review is a time consuming process. Promises of a speedy peer-review process in an indication that either no peer-review is taking place, or the peer-review that is happening is of low quality.
Many predatory journals claim to have a rigorous peer review process when no peer review actually exists.
The NOAA Central Library is to support and further NOAA’s mission of promoting global environmental stewardship in order to conserve and wisely manage the Nation's marine and coastal resources; and describing, monitoring, and predicting changes in the Earth's environment in order to ensure and enhance sustainable economic opportunities.